I can now proudly say that I am a signatory of the Euston Manifesto. Having been aware of it for about a year, and having spent a great deal of time over the last year arguing and rehearsing some of it’s central points, I finally decided to sign. This decision has been helped along greatly by what I’ve been reading in 2007, but also lately by Joe introducing me to Little Atoms and all the great interview downloads on the site. Little Atoms has been a revelation in reassuring me that I’m not alone in my views.

The pro-intervention left have been poorly represented in the mainstream liberal media (so a common refrain of signatories of the Euston Manifesto is what a relief it is to be connected to others of a similar position via the wonders of the Internet). Lots of factors have contributed to this situation but I especially feel that post-modernism’s challenge to enlightenment values is somehow at the heart of this.

Some of the creators of the manifesto opposed the war in Iraq and this is clearly written into it as a valid position to hold. As Norman Geras said at the Launch: “Reasonable people can reasonably disagree”. But both sides of that debate are united in a disillusionment with the state of the left, with its marginal far-left factions, but perhaps more importantly with the left’s representatives within the liberal establishment. The massive schism created by the 9 11 terrorist attacks and the end of the cold war has thrown the left into a crisis. The Euston Manifesto is an attempt to formulate a progressive program that is true to the left’s best historical values.

Whilst half asleep recently I half heard a report on the today program about the launch of a new magazine. I’d forgotten the name of it until this morning, or perhaps thought it was a dream. Monocle Magazine, the name of which hitherto eluded me, is now counting down to the release of issue three. The website is worth looking at for the quality of the design alone. It was conceived by the founder of Wallpaper so you would expect a level of visual panache.

The concept outlined on the website is nothing if not ambitious:

We believe it’s time for a new, global, European-based media brand. With a keen focus, strong reporting, sharp wit and a more classic approach to design, we’ve dubbed our venture Monocle. At the core there’s a monthly magazine delivering the most original coverage in global affairs, business, culture and design. Alongside, there’s a web-based broadcast component covering the same areas through a variety of bulletins, mini-documentaries and talk formats. Focused on informing and entertaining an international audience of disillusioned readers, listeners and viewers, it is our intention to create a community of the most interested and interesting people in the world.

I have to admit that on the surface it doesn’t seem quite like the kind of magazine I had wished for. I haven’t bought a magazine regularly since The Face and Jockey Slut folded and I was hoping this might be the one to the fill the gap. Annual subscription is seventy five pounds which is a bit steep, and no doubt individual issues are at least a fiver. Worth looking at in the library though.


What do you make of these? Apparently Bowie loves them, and we all know he’s never wrong about anything ever don’t we?

Mr. Cameron’s ascent to the premiership of the British regime looks set to continue unabated with the news that he’s won ’2nd best dressed man’ in GQ’s annual list!

“Is David Cameron tough enough to be prime minister?” it asked on the cover of an earlier issue that had also boosted the conservative leader’s profile. What the bloody hell is that supposed to mean? Well he does look kind of hard in that picture; one toff you’re probably not going to mess with. For some reason GQ seem to love him. You know what, I wouldn’t be surprised if there was some sort of Eton connection between him and the editorial there. Maybe him and Charles what’s-his-name who works for the magazine used to smoke pot together behind the Egerton room together back in 82′. Or else it’s something much more sinister.

In just a few months Britain will have a new Prime Minister. It’s looking like it will be Gordon Brown, (though David Miliband is potentially a contender). And I think it’s going to take more than a few glossy magazine covers to get the tories back into power at the next general election. I think Gordon Brown is more popular with the electorate than some sections of the media would have us believe.

On April the first I was nearly taken in by a Channel 4 news article about The Arctic Monkeys offering their support to David Miliband as a potential leader of the Labour party. He was to join them on stage at Glastonbury in a bid to launch his campaign to younger voters. It seemed plausible enough. It seems that everything in the political sphere is becoming increasingly divorced from reality, and at the moment that seems to be in the in the conservatives favor. I’m half expecting Cameron to launch a radical new conservative policy of re-nationalising the railways or something.

I was listening to Women’s hour a couple of months ago when there was a feature about a new craze sweeping the homes of super-rich Manhattenites. Apparently the new fashion accessory for the working mum is the the male nanny, or ‘manny’. The refined New York journalist being interviewed on the show explained that the male nanny offers a different kind of service to the more conventional female one. The manny takes the boys to the park and tires them out playing baseball. He provides a role model for youngsters with fathers that work long hours. You can read all about the new craze here, and here. The type of young man who typically fulfils this role is a graduate or on some kind of gap year. He is well spoken and well dressed and has a clear vision about what the future holds for him. She expressed a faith in the effectiveness of interviews for determining the appropriateness of a candidate for a position. Despite Jenni Murray’s attempts to undermine the concept, the interviewee was convinced of the wisdom of the idea and so am I. Her NewYorker’s assuredness was simply impossible to deny.

 

I’d forgotten about all this until a couple of days ago having lunch with a friend. We were talking about my moving to London and what I was going to do with myself when I got there when it suddenly came to me ‘London Mannies‘! © How could it fail? What ever is big in NY is bound to eventually take hold of London’s ultra-rich also. So Tom has registered the domain name for me and now we’re ready to roll. Don’t hesitate to contact me if you want in on this exciting new business venture. We can talk strategy.

Tom Wolfe’s latest novel charts the the trials and trepidations of a beautiful, poor, working class southerner in her first semester at a fictional elite University. Critically the book was poorly received but having just finished it myself I think that this general appraisal is unfair. If anything this book is not so much intended for the audience that lapped up The Bonfire of the Vanities in the 80s. I believe this book is of more interest to, and perhaps intended for a younger generation of readers.

As a novelist who only releases an opus into the world every ten years or so, it’s only natural for him to try and capture the zeitgeist in some way. Though in some respects true to form, this is more than just an expansive journalistic novel about life for American University students in the first decade of the twenty-first century.

I believe it’s telling that one of the ‘athlete friendly’ courses available to students of Dupont University is entitled ‘The French Novel: From Flaubert to Houellebecq’ (and I don’t believe this to be just a casual reference). For me Houellebecq is the most successful contemporary novelist in capturing the spirit of our times and unfortunately, it ain’t pretty. There are themes and set-pieces in Wolf’e's last novel that synthesise the nihilistic houellebecqian world-view that reduces us just to the subject of our drives. I am Charlotte Simmons, like all of his novels, positively oozes testosterone despite the principle character being an eighteen year old girl. Indeed, they are in accordance with the way in which societies denigrate status along alpha beta distinctions, and one’s success or failure is further complicated by the unrealistic expectations fostered by a hyper-sexualised consumerist society. Weedy beta-male Adam who is Wolfes’s counterpoint to all the muscular superstar jocks and frat boys is a sexual failure and makes desperate trips to the gym in order to ‘buff up’ and adhere to the fashionable ideal for male students. He indulges in revenge fantasies about Dupont’s celebrity ‘student athletes’ who are the source of much of his torment.

Amongst other things, this book is very much about sport and the pre-eminent position it occupies in the American University system. How the system works, of kids going to college primarily to play ‘football’ for instance, on the basis of sporting prowess rather than academic ability, had always been something of a mystery to me. My conclusion: it’s just plain weird; and a little creepy. In Wolfe’s novels the main athletes and alpha-fratboys think of themselves as a privileged warrior class who are entitled to all the spoils of war.

The ‘might is right’ attitude that reflects America’s imperial ethos and pervades its educational system has crept steadily into the British system also. The Yealmpton press the other month had an article about Yealmpton Primary school and it reminded me of my experience there as a student teacher on an observation week in late September last year. It was quite an enjoyable week in that I was able to walk there through the woods everyday as I had done as a child, and be home again by about a quarter to four each day. The children were incredibly sweet, some of them at least, and I was quite smitten with them towards the end of the week. I got a sense of the school as being at the heart of the community with parents (mostly mums) having an integrated relationship with the institution. Rural village primary schools are a little microcosm, everyone knows everyone else, parents are involved on a day to day basis with the running of the school, and staff have to be amenable to this. This aspect of village life remains constant and rightly so, but much has changed in the last twenty years or so.

When I attended it form the mid eighties to the early nineties it was a primary school with a second to none reputation for music tuition in the county. This was due largely to the commitment of the then Head, the eccentric but well meaning Dennis Breeze. He must represent the last of a generation of teachers for whom the national curriculum was something to be promptly disposed of each year. For better or worse, you wouldn’t be able to get away with it now. He taught what he knew and what he knew was music, perhaps to the detriment of non-musical children, but nevertheless he was widely respected, despite some of his more unsavoury views. The local community was aware of what the school was like, what it valued and tried to nurture, and could opt out of sending children there if it wanted to.

These days the school is still widely respected but in a different field altogether. Now it is regarded an exemplar in the world of primary physical education. I picked up on this in my time there by the fact that a few of the staff were wearing tracksuits; all of the time. Now, I believe that as a youngster myself I would have found this slightly out of the ordinary and questionable. The reason being that staff on the days they were teaching P.E (which seemed to be most days) there simply wasn’t enough time to get changed, with all the demands on your time that the job entails. I believe however, that attire is important as it gives of certain messages, it reflects deeper structures. Call me old fashioned, but doesn’t a school master have a duty to dress smartly and like an educator, not like an athlete?

It’s a slippery slope if you ask me. Once our culture has been so utterly ravaged beyond all recognition all that’ll be left is sport and millions of baying screaming morons at the side-line.

Tom Wolfe doesn’t do things by half and there’s no doubting his dedication and success, to my mind, in capturing the vernacular of his young subjects, an aspect that some critics found unsatisfactory. Unfortunately the book is more infamous for it’s winning the Bad Sex Award in 2004. This in my view is not entirely undeserved, the excrutiating accounts of copulation are calculatedly cringe-worthy. And at times he lays in on a bit thick and you can’t get that voice out your head reminding you that this is a book about modern teenagers written by someone in the their seventies.

If I am Charlotte Simmons has one main flaw it is that that it is overly long at nearly seven hundred densely printed pages. I think this maybe Wolfe’s ‘up-yours’ to the contemporary convention of shorter novels. Having finally gotten through it myself I feel I have spent a whole semester at ‘Dupont’ University my self – and that is how it should be. Personally I like longer novels – it becomes more of a voyage, the joy of the novel is that it is long and involving process in way that a piece of cinema never can be for instance. Wolfe consciously adopts a literary style that predates cinema and television and I admire his commitment to this ideal. I think more people should read this book and that the popular press did us a disservice by so promptly dismissing it, bad sex and all.

Arcade fire neon bibleThis week I have been mostly listening to Arcade Fire’s new album ‘Neon Bible’. If you liked their first album you’ll almost certainly like this one. I think it’s fabulous. What a great band. After their first album they bought a church in which to record this one. It worked as there are some amazing sounds on it; in particular a majestic organ on the track ‘intervention’ that just hits you in the chest.

There was a good bit in Paul Morley’s long and gushing interview in Observer Music Monthly last weekend about watching them play in Manhattan. Apparently David Byrne and Lou Reed were seated in a sort of exclusive press box. Maybe they’d both received one of David Bowie’s complimentary copies of their first album that he allegedly bought in bulk to give to friends. No emotion or reaction registered on Lou Reed’s face throughout the entire gig. Maybe that’s because he was freaked out by Morley staring at him the whole time.

Part of me resents the channel 4 weekend ‘list format’ for its lazy and cheap approach to programming, but ‘The 100 Greatest Stand Ups’ on Sunday evening was interesting and informative – the two of the four hours of it I watched anyway. It introduced me to some new comedians, and showed some rare footage of well established performers. Particularly shocking was footage of Eddie Murphy’s deleted ‘delirious’ show where he makes some very ignorant comments about homosexuals and AIDS, but Eddie Murphy was never exactly ‘alternative’. What was more interesting was how this program highlighted the radically alternative right-wing, misogynistic, proudly bigoted and down right obscene fringes of the circuit, and I’m not just talking about Jim Davidson here.

There is this vile man, the successful career of which stateside, I am probably too young to remember, who goes by the name of Andrew “Dice” Clay. He was selling out venues like Madison Square Garden in the 80s and 90s to an audience of white suburban adolescent boys who lapped up his obnoxious sexist take on life. On this page you can read samples of his trademark nursery rhymes which I’ve deemed too disgusting to reproduce here.

What puzzles me is that some fairly influential people must have thought him funny because in 1989 he hosted the MTV video awards. His act was so blue and offensive he was subsequently banned from the network. Even more remarkable was that shortly after this appearance, he guest hosted Saturday Night Live causing cast members and other performers to boycott the show. But looking back, it now seems that what was going on at that time was the beginning of the backlash against political correctness, and for a brief moment, it may have seemed hip to adopt such a stance. Feminism was coming under a sustained attack from the political right and it seems television executives couldn’t resist a piece of the action.

Fortunately Andrew “Dice” Clay’s star faded as quickly as it had risen and the entertainment establishment saw some kind of sense. After a brief spell trying to remodel his image in the 90s, he now performs (according to this website), in his “Dice Man” persona again in Las Vegas – but to considerably smaller audiences one would imagine.

The astute comedian, critic, and commentator Stewart Lee, who was one of the talking heads on the show, made the point that there are ‘comedy greats’ among us now, who may not be receiving the coverage and adulation they deserve. In particular he singled out Daniel Kitson for high praise. But this show also reminded me about people like Jerry Sadowitz and Dennis Leary who I’d like to hear more of in the future.

Apparently hat wearing funkster berk Jay Kay has announced he’s to retire from the music business to sit on his huge pile of cash and raise a family. http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,2023261,00.html   Great news for popular music (not the poetential replication of his DNA but rather his exit from the industry).  He’d been getting away with it for way too long.

I  just had a coffee in the village cafe and had a conversation with an sweet octogenarian lady who used to be a neighbour.  After a while I realised that she thought she ws talking to my dad.   Yet more evidence of my dire need to extricate myself from this place.  I need to be somewhere  I can be anonymous and where the simple act of going out for a coffee doesn’t necessarily result in awkward and embarrassing social situations.  As luck would have it I’m leaving for Barcelona on Saturday and not a monent to soon it would seem.

I just wanted to share with you this picture of the conservative leader, and,perhaps prime minister in waiting.  Isn’t it awful?  Can you imagine Michael Howard the ‘Prince of Darkeness’ being photographed in such a way?  Go on just look at it and imagine.  I think it says a lot about where the tories are now.  It’s taken from an article about him in Observer Women, an issue that tells us Cameron has been voted 7th in a poll of the “the 50 men who really understand women”.  I have to admit I haven’t been able to bring myself to read the article – it features pictures of him with his children and pronouncements about the need for more women in the conservative party.  But the picture, the picture’s been vexing me. It seems to say:
“Come on we’ve all grown up now, there’s no more Punch and Judy politics now, I’m appealing to your sense of irony, vote for me – you know you want to.  I’m so confidant in my own appeal, I can adopt this pose and credit you with the intelligence to see beyond the ‘Nasty Party’ veneer and make the right choice.”

Well that’s my take on it anyway.

The more observant among you may have noticed that there was a previous post ‘iphone’ that said nothing at all.  That was because I started to write something but then got so pissed off with this stupid web-host thingey that I had to abandon it.  Basically I was really excited about the iphone having just watched a video on Youtube I wanted to share it with you.  With the initial fanfare I had failed to grasp how amazing they are and like a complete dullard it took some step-by-step infomercial thing on CNN to convince me of their brilliance (bet the battery life is shit though).  Anyway my own ineptitude as a web programmer coupled with this stupid ‘mr site’ idiot proof system conspired to prohibit me from putting said infomercial on the site.  So I was thinking about moving somewhere else – a more conventional blog service of somekind perhaps.  Honestly, it takes me longer to publish this crap on here than it does to write the damned things in the first place.  Something’s got to give.