<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Le Flâneur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.le-flaneur.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.le-flaneur.com</link>
	<description>Seeking out the Beautiful and the Monstrous...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:32:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A new beginning? by Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.le-flaneur.com/2010/01/18/a-new-beginning/comment-page-1/#comment-2375</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.le-flaneur.com/?p=179#comment-2375</guid>
		<description>Yay! Sorry I haven&#039;t been able to help you with the CSS for a week or so. Let me know if you still want me to look at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay! Sorry I haven&#8217;t been able to help you with the CSS for a week or so. Let me know if you still want me to look at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John Gray weighs in by benedict</title>
		<link>http://www.le-flaneur.com/2008/03/15/john-gray-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-1936</link>
		<dc:creator>benedict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.le-flaneur.com/2008/03/15/john-gray-weighs-in/#comment-1936</guid>
		<description>Thanks for putting this up - it&#039;ll do nicely for my &#039;secularisation and postmodernism&#039; lesson next term.
I think you make a good point, Tom, about &#039;suicide murder&#039; and war.

Gray writes a very powerful argument and recognises that religion isn&#039;t a belief in a certain set of propositions - well, no more than speaking in any language requires - but a set of symbols with which humans communicate their consciousness in social communities. The meaning of these symbols comes, not only from their use, as Wittgenstein might assert, but also from the very reason to use them at all.  This reason is the conscious yet immaterial will, the feeling of purpose.  Religion, then, might be said to be the characteristic of doing something for a shared purpose.

Also, Gray is aware that the scientific symbolic language that is useful in predicting things is not necessarily a sufficient set of symbols with which to communicate.  Or benign.  That said, a belief in God is not necessary, or sufficient or benign either.

I don&#039;t know - perhaps I&#039;m just sticking to an annoyingly wide definition of religion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for putting this up &#8211; it&#8217;ll do nicely for my &#8217;secularisation and postmodernism&#8217; lesson next term.<br />
I think you make a good point, Tom, about &#8217;suicide murder&#8217; and war.</p>
<p>Gray writes a very powerful argument and recognises that religion isn&#8217;t a belief in a certain set of propositions &#8211; well, no more than speaking in any language requires &#8211; but a set of symbols with which humans communicate their consciousness in social communities. The meaning of these symbols comes, not only from their use, as Wittgenstein might assert, but also from the very reason to use them at all.  This reason is the conscious yet immaterial will, the feeling of purpose.  Religion, then, might be said to be the characteristic of doing something for a shared purpose.</p>
<p>Also, Gray is aware that the scientific symbolic language that is useful in predicting things is not necessarily a sufficient set of symbols with which to communicate.  Or benign.  That said, a belief in God is not necessary, or sufficient or benign either.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know &#8211; perhaps I&#8217;m just sticking to an annoyingly wide definition of religion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jeffrey Lewis, 12 Crass Songs by Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.le-flaneur.com/2007/11/09/jeffrey-lewis-12-crass-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.le-flaneur.com/2007/11/09/jeffrey-lewis-12-crass-songs/#comment-804</guid>
		<description>Crass did rant, but they were anything but juvenile.  In fact they represented a high water mark of punk: a band with lyrics sharp enough to cut somthing with.  The fact that Lewis did the covers means that we can actually understand all the lyrics and get inspired by them.  In fact, he really makes these songs his own,and for that this album is a classic that has yet to have its day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crass did rant, but they were anything but juvenile.  In fact they represented a high water mark of punk: a band with lyrics sharp enough to cut somthing with.  The fact that Lewis did the covers means that we can actually understand all the lyrics and get inspired by them.  In fact, he really makes these songs his own,and for that this album is a classic that has yet to have its day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John Gray weighs in by Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.le-flaneur.com/2008/03/15/john-gray-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.le-flaneur.com/2008/03/15/john-gray-weighs-in/#comment-787</guid>
		<description>Ha! I missed that one. Yeah because no-one had been executed until the Red Brigades came along. Give me a break.

As to the use of suicide attacks, they also existed a long time before the Tamil Tigers. Aside from the obvious Kamikaze example, it has long been seen as &#039;sweet and noble&#039; to &#039;give up one&#039;s life for one&#039;s country&#039;.

Insofar as all soldiers are expected to give up their lives in war, if needs be, the concept of &#039;suicide murder&#039; is actually much murkier than Hitchens or Gray admit.

Actually, I haven&#039;t read Hitchens&#039;s book but I disliked The God Delusion. Is God Is Not Great as preachy and irritating?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! I missed that one. Yeah because no-one had been executed until the Red Brigades came along. Give me a break.</p>
<p>As to the use of suicide attacks, they also existed a long time before the Tamil Tigers. Aside from the obvious Kamikaze example, it has long been seen as &#8217;sweet and noble&#8217; to &#8216;give up one&#8217;s life for one&#8217;s country&#8217;.</p>
<p>Insofar as all soldiers are expected to give up their lives in war, if needs be, the concept of &#8217;suicide murder&#8217; is actually much murkier than Hitchens or Gray admit.</p>
<p>Actually, I haven&#8217;t read Hitchens&#8217;s book but I disliked The God Delusion. Is God Is Not Great as preachy and irritating?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John Gray weighs in by Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.le-flaneur.com/2008/03/15/john-gray-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.le-flaneur.com/2008/03/15/john-gray-weighs-in/#comment-786</guid>
		<description>And also &quot;Islamo-Leninism&quot;  Gimme a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And also &#8220;Islamo-Leninism&#8221;  Gimme a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John Gray weighs in by Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.le-flaneur.com/2008/03/15/john-gray-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.le-flaneur.com/2008/03/15/john-gray-weighs-in/#comment-785</guid>
		<description>Well he&#039;s definitely right when he says that many atheists are now just as evangelical as many theists.

What I find odd is that he describes religion as having been politically powerful in the 20th century, something I see little evidence for. Socialism, Soviet communism and German &amp; Italian fascism all happened in spite of religious concerns, not because of them. In fact, Nazism was based on a sort of spiritualist natural-law mumbo-jumbo which was the precursor for the &#039;Hippie&#039; movement of San Francisco some years later and was positively anti-religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well he&#8217;s definitely right when he says that many atheists are now just as evangelical as many theists.</p>
<p>What I find odd is that he describes religion as having been politically powerful in the 20th century, something I see little evidence for. Socialism, Soviet communism and German &amp; Italian fascism all happened in spite of religious concerns, not because of them. In fact, Nazism was based on a sort of spiritualist natural-law mumbo-jumbo which was the precursor for the &#8216;Hippie&#8217; movement of San Francisco some years later and was positively anti-religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Max Gogarty Story by ourman</title>
		<link>http://www.le-flaneur.com/2008/02/16/the-max-gogarty-story/comment-page-1/#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>ourman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.le-flaneur.com/2008/02/16/the-max-gogarty-story/#comment-781</guid>
		<description>Funny, the morning before Max&#039;s piece went live I was writing about the Guardian and complaining of its awful way of looking at everything from a North London point of view.  Everything they write, regarding outside of this area is sneering and patronising.

I think I was not the only one to feel this way.  There&#039;s a quote, that I have since added to my blog, that suggests people are tired of this whole Muswell-Hill-centric attitude to everything.  The Guardian&#039;s whole word is its luvvy media friends.

Max got abuse but not nearly as much as the travel editor.  It&#039;s a reflection of how stale and small minded the Guardian has become that it thought the whole debacle was a good idea.

Time for a shake up there - less yoof orientated crap (no skins, no big brother), time for them to discover life outside of North London and time for them to ditch the New Labour smugness and get interested in real issues again.

Time for grit, anger and a wider perspective and time to lose this awful awful small minded crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, the morning before Max&#8217;s piece went live I was writing about the Guardian and complaining of its awful way of looking at everything from a North London point of view.  Everything they write, regarding outside of this area is sneering and patronising.</p>
<p>I think I was not the only one to feel this way.  There&#8217;s a quote, that I have since added to my blog, that suggests people are tired of this whole Muswell-Hill-centric attitude to everything.  The Guardian&#8217;s whole word is its luvvy media friends.</p>
<p>Max got abuse but not nearly as much as the travel editor.  It&#8217;s a reflection of how stale and small minded the Guardian has become that it thought the whole debacle was a good idea.</p>
<p>Time for a shake up there &#8211; less yoof orientated crap (no skins, no big brother), time for them to discover life outside of North London and time for them to ditch the New Labour smugness and get interested in real issues again.</p>
<p>Time for grit, anger and a wider perspective and time to lose this awful awful small minded crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why did we all like CSS? by Tom Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.le-flaneur.com/2008/02/12/why-did-we-all-like-css/comment-page-1/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.le-flaneur.com/2008/02/12/why-did-we-all-like-css/#comment-772</guid>
		<description>I think a lot of it has to do with wanting to &#039;get hoochy&#039; with Lovefoxxx. CSS aren&#039;t that bad and are generally more entertaining to listen to than Robbie Williams&#039;s dreary, soulless ballads.

But yeah, most of the album&#039;s filler, and pretty weak filler at that.

I find myself listening to more and more adult-oriented music which matches my numerous white hairs. I&#039;ll be shopping at the Gap next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot of it has to do with wanting to &#8216;get hoochy&#8217; with Lovefoxxx. CSS aren&#8217;t that bad and are generally more entertaining to listen to than Robbie Williams&#8217;s dreary, soulless ballads.</p>
<p>But yeah, most of the album&#8217;s filler, and pretty weak filler at that.</p>
<p>I find myself listening to more and more adult-oriented music which matches my numerous white hairs. I&#8217;ll be shopping at the Gap next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why did we all like CSS? by Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.le-flaneur.com/2008/02/12/why-did-we-all-like-css/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.le-flaneur.com/2008/02/12/why-did-we-all-like-css/#comment-771</guid>
		<description>&quot;I really like arcade fire&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I really like arcade fire&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reasons why HBO&#8217;s The Wire is great by Miriam Siscovick</title>
		<link>http://www.le-flaneur.com/2007/11/16/10-reasons-why-hbos-the-wire-is-great/comment-page-1/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>Miriam Siscovick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.le-flaneur.com/2007/11/16/10-reasons-why-hbos-the-wire-is-great/#comment-765</guid>
		<description>Hey!

Wanted to let you guys know that the cast members from &quot;The Wire&quot; will be doing a special DVD signing of The Wire: The Complete Fourth Season on Thursday, December 13th at 12:30pm at J&amp;R Music and Computer World in NYC! Cast members scheduled to appear are Chad L. Coleman, Jermained Crawford, Seth Gilliam, Demenick Lombardozzi, Julito McCullum and Tristan Wilds!!

Come meet the cast and get a signed DVD!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!</p>
<p>Wanted to let you guys know that the cast members from &#8220;The Wire&#8221; will be doing a special DVD signing of The Wire: The Complete Fourth Season on Thursday, December 13th at 12:30pm at J&amp;R Music and Computer World in NYC! Cast members scheduled to appear are Chad L. Coleman, Jermained Crawford, Seth Gilliam, Demenick Lombardozzi, Julito McCullum and Tristan Wilds!!</p>
<p>Come meet the cast and get a signed DVD!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
